This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
| less than a minute read

Security vs Privacy

As reported in The FT this week, tech companies, telcos, and others are pursuing the lucrative home automation and security markets with a range of devices, from doorbells to robot vacuum cleaners.

For the individual, these may involve giving up some privacy to gain convenience and security. However for neighbours, for example, there may be no benefits to set against the loss of privacy, arising from being filmed leaving or entering the house, or recorded having a conversation on the doorstep. 

Manufacturers of these products would be wise to consider the implications for GDPR and other privacy regulations at design time, and provide greater control over their range and scope of coverage. Otherwise, we will create a surveillance environment that no-one wants, and the manufacturers will find themselves subject to much more stringent regulation.

Home security is a lucrative market. Research and Markets estimates that it will reach $51bn next year. Constant monitoring may be comforting to the user. But if you are one of the neighbours who walk past these cameras every day, there is no opt out. Nor is there a requirement for the owner to let you know they have installed a camera and that you are now being recorded. To some, this is creepy. In the UK, it has already caused a problem. This month, a judge upheld claims that a Ring owner was invading the privacy of his neighbour. The judge focused on the audio, which has a longer range than the video. This, she said, could be collected from people unaware of the device, which breached the Data Protection Act 2018 and the UK General Data Protection Regulation.

Tags

data privacy, security